Friday, January 19, 2007

Is Playboy Blind? The Victoria Beckham Possibility


I don't get the Victoria "Posh Spice" Beckham appeal. Sure, there was a time when the poshest of Spice Girls was attractive (for a British chick), but that was before she underwent this weird transformation into an overly tanned, zombie looking woman with gigantic robo-tits. That's not just silicon in there. I'm pretty sure there's enough sophisticated scientific gadgetry in Victoria Beckham's knockers to do your taxes . . . and not get audited. Take that H&R Block. So, taking that into consideration, Playboy wants her for a pictorial spread? What? Here's the quote:
The former Spice Girl was today given a glimpse of the opportunities awaiting Britain's most famous couple when they move to Los Angeles this summer when she was invited to take part in a Playboy "pictorial" by Hugh Hefner, the magazine's founder.

Speaking with three of his playmates, Hefner said that he was confident that David Beckham would be a huge success in America when he comes to start playing for Los Angeles Galaxy in August and offered something to occupy his wife while the midfielder starts to earn his promised $250 million (£129 million).

"She should do a pictorial with us. We’ve got big plans for her. I think she’s going to fit in fine."
I don't read Playboy myself. Mostly because the advent of Internet-based pornography makes the publication obsolete. But now, I have a new reason. Seeing a naked Posh Spice would kill my penis. Straight out obliterate it. So much so, than it's wake, I would end up with a vagina and a very serious hormonal problem. My vote is no. No Victoria Beckham in Playboy. One more reason why below.

No comments:

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Custom Search
Apple iTunes
.Mac (Apple Computer, Inc.)